Culmine apprezza lo sforzo della traduzione in inglese del comunicato della Cospirazione delle Cellule di Fuoco in merito ai fatti del 5 maggio, ad Atene. Non abbiamo intenzione di tradurlo in italiano, perché c’è sempre il dubbio che la traduzione non sia rigorosamente fedele all’originale in greco.
Ma ci pare interessante sottolineare dei passaggi -in inglese- del lungo comunicato per aiutare a capire il loro pensiero.
Di fatto, in questo comunicato vengono esposte alcune caratteristiche del cosiddetto Nichilismo Rivoluzionario, ben diverso dall’Insurrezionalismo Anarchico. Si parla specificatamente di un “new anarchy individualistic – nihilistic trend“, non si ha il timore nel rivendicarsi come terroristi o nichilisti; ma allo stesso tempo si critica il feticismo della violenza disorganizzata.
La selezione dei passaggi è nostra, volutamente arbitraria. Ma si tratta di quelli che troviamo più stimolanti.
In attesa del loro manifesto su “the positions and the values over the trend of nihilism, the anarchist – individualism and the revolutionary terorrism that we express.”
dal nostro nulla,
un saluto ribelle alla Cospirazione delle Cellule di Fuoco
Culmine
______________________________________________________________
The revolutionary nihilism that we express implies a fine thought
and practice which is being built away from demonstrations of
fake-cynicism “they were bank employees so they done well to
burn them …”, but also from hypocritical threnodies that seek
guilties in order to attibute the blaim, orating from the position of
the infallible and humanist revolutionary.
Let’s take the things from the begining…
The new anarchy individualistic – nihilistic trend, the third pole as
we’ve described, it shapes a new perception in relation to the social
struggle and demonstrations. In the tens of thousands of mass that
flock to the mass demonstrations we do not necessarily recognize
people who share the same value code with us and speak the language
of liberation. The social mobilization is a mishmash of
inconsistencies and behaviors, includes all the territories of human
thought, from the peasant conservatism, to the left winger
patriotism, the alternative, the reformism, up to the anarchist view.
…
Our goal is to organize the “REVOLOUTIONARY MILITARISM”. A
anti-hierarchical perception without leaders, ranks and followers
that will promote the creation of small flexible battle groups of
antiauthoritarians that will map the city, the targets, the getaways,
will be equipped properly, will develop relationships with their
respective affinity groups, will be open (with the necessary
attention) to new partners, will devise plans of attack and will use
(but will not turn hostile) the “working-rights demonstrations”
as a Trojan horse of revolutionary campaigns. So there is no question
concerning the participation to demonstrations or not, but only the
question of evolution.
We believe that only through the organised dimension of revolutionary
violence the consequence, continuity, and severity that would
“prohibit” the future of such “failures” with
such tragic results of Marfin, will be promoted. This is the only way
that the new guerrilla movement will spread as a perception and a
practice, causing the chaos in the sterile routine of the organized
boredom.
The statements of loyalty and humanity missionary texts that were
circulated by some anarchist collectives with the certainty of the
sentence about the origin of the “perpetrators” , have
given the ultimate emptiness for political arguments about the
“nihilistic trend” that “parasite against anarchy.”
Their picturesqueness don’t bothers us, but when certain people reach
in the dangerous point to “photograph” persons in
auditoriums and cafeterias just to satisfy the eager ears of the
police, then these individuals will be treated as they deserve, as
informers of the police with the corresponding consequences.
Coming back to the how and why in the case of Marfin, independent from which
anarchist tendency feels each one that is expressed as individual or
collectiveness, we must recognize that the three political
movements (“social anarchists“,
“insurrectionalists“, “individualists –
nihilists“) have a common characteristic.
We are not able to know exactly what happened there and what was said,
but we know the chronic weaknesses that we believe contributed to the
result. We refer to the fetishism of disorganized violence and
the lack of understanding the means of attack.
Next to the fetishism of violence, flowers the imperfect knowledge. Some
comrades are ignoring the effectiveness of means of violence and the
danger of these means, so they make excessive use, such as scenic
hours of fighting from inside the university shelters, but also in
unorganized attacks in riot police in Exarchia, dozens of cocktails
molotov, that what usually accomplish is to“blacken” the asphalt,
while the same people if had discussed and were organized could smash
the cops and set fire to the police van.
So with this reason given, it’s the suitable spark to supply more our
thoughts and our actions moving in a future publication of a
manifesto of the positions and the values over the trend of nihilism,
the anarchist – individualism and the revolutionary
terorrism that we express.
CONSPIRACY CELLS OF FIRE
GUERILLA GROUP OF TERRORISTS
NIHILIST FRACTION